AI governance & complianceYour staff use AI. Sensitive data .
RedactWall stops sensitive data leaving through AI tools and email, finds it in the files already sitting in your cloud drives, and turns every decision into evidence your own team can check.
Your controls were built for a world without AI
Staff adopted AI tools faster than anyone approved them.
- A customer file pasted into a chatbot leaves as ordinary web traffic.
- Blocking yesterday’s list of AI sites misses the shadow-AI tool your staff opened this morning.
- When an auditor or examiner asks what left, a log you control is not the same as evidence.
Every path out, and what stands on it
Two paths are decided before anything moves. One finds and reports what is already in your drives. Two more are decided on the device. We publish which is which.
What that looks like in practice
- An employee pastes a customer file into a chatbot → stopped before it reaches the model, and the attempt is on the record.
- An AI assistant repeats an account number back in its answer → caught on the way back, before staff see it.
- Someone emails a customer list to a personal account → refused before the message is accepted for delivery.
- An auditor asks what left the organization last quarter → hand over a sealed package covering exactly that period.
Nothing for your developers to learn
One setting per application: the address it already sends to. There is no SDK to adopt.
Proof you do not have to trust us for
A decision your reviewer can read, on a record your own team can confirm is intact.
A loan officer tried to forward a member list to a personal webmail address.
- Destination
- Personal webmail
- Found
- 42 member records, 42 account numbers
- Policy
- Member data to personal accounts
- Decided
- Before the message was accepted
Your data never enters the record
The record names the kind of sensitive data found. It never holds the values, the message, or the file.
Questions we get
More answers, and everything about where the product stands today, on the FAQ page.
Do we have to stop staff using AI?
No. That is the point. Work carries on, and the things that should not leave are stopped. You are not choosing between productivity and control.
Does anything get installed on staff laptops?
Not for the main controls, which run in the cloud. There are optional device and browser components for what leaves from a laptop and never passes a server. They sit on top of the cloud controls, not in place of them.
Do you store our data?
No. Nothing we inspect is kept. The record says what kind of sensitive data was found and what was decided about it, never the data itself.
Will this help with AI compliance and examinations?
It gives you material to prepare with: a sealed package covering a period you name, and a way for your team to confirm the record is intact.
Is this data loss prevention?
It is data loss prevention for the paths AI uses: stopped before it moves in AI tools and outbound email, found and reported after the fact in cloud drives. What the platform covers →
Are you certified?
Not yet. See where each attestation stands today. Disclosures →
How do we know it covers what you say it covers?
We publish what every surface covers, surface by surface. Read the coverage table →
Stop the leak. Not the work.
The engineering team onboards your pilot directly, starting with the surface you care about most.
- One setting change per application
- No SDK for your developers to adopt
- Your sensitive data is never stored
- Coverage published surface by surface